CFDs and Spread bets are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread bets with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs and Spread bets work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

United States equities closed higher after an uneventful trading day on Wednesday. The explanation is that investors are waiting for the three-day economic symposium by Jack Hole that will begin on 1st September. The symposium seeks to interpret what Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chairman, would say about central banks’ next moves on interest rates. Although the symposium will significantly impact the US stock market, investors must also check out the weak economic data this week. Some concerning reports include slumping sales and falling home prices, resulting in a sputtering housing market.

Other essential economic reports to check out during the remaining part of the week include the personal consumption expenditures price index and jobless claims on Friday and Thursday, respectively. Overnight the NASDAQ Composite increased by 0.41%, the S&P rose by 0.29%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average increased by 0.18%. The best performing industries included oil & gas, internet services, agriculture, silver, and coal. Financials, real estate, and energy were the best-performing S&P 500 sectors.

Generally, energy firms now dictate the top-yielding S&P 500 stocks index as more gas & oil producers implement flexible dividend payout policies. These flexible dividends can acknowledge that the energy firms are outsize returns from the current high energy prices. Therefore, ESG-based investing, governance, and social and environmental factors are luring energy companies such as gas & coal to launch big capital management plans to help entice new stakeholders.

Last year, in the US Maine state, the government implemented a law to help deprive the 200 leading widely traded fossil fuel firms of their annuity funds by 2026. They cited environmental risks as a significant challenge to potential investment performance. Nonetheless, ESG principles appear to be divided along democratic and republican political divides for state annuity funds. Most of them have introduced new initiatives over the past years, either to deprive state annuity funds of ammunition & gun companies or coal companies and gas & oil companies.

The US potential presidential candidates are now advancing campaigns against governance and social and environmental investing. Some state boards of administration have adopted proposals to ban consideration of ideological, political, or social interests when making critical investment decisions for the state’s annuity fund. These resolutions have imposed broad limits on the annuity fund’s investments. Hence, state administrators are working under instructions to prioritize “the maximum return on investment for state beneficiaries, without considering political factors & non-economic beliefs.”